4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The effect of a novel irreversible inhibitor of aldehyde dehydrogenases 1 and 3 on tumour cell growth and death

期刊

CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS
卷 130, 期 1-3, 页码 209-218

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2797(00)00280-5

关键词

hepatoma cells; aldehyde dehydrogenases; chemical inhibitors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs) are a family of several isoenzymes expressed in various tissues and in all subcellular fractions. In some tumours, there is an increase of ALDH activity, especially that of class 1 and 3. The increase in the activity of these isoenzymes is correlated with cell growth and drug resistance shown by these cells. It has been observed that hepatoma cells expressing low ALDH3 activity are more susceptible to growth inhibition by low concentration of lipid peroxidation products than hepatoma cells expressing high ALDH3 activity. The products of lipid peroxidation are good substrates for ALDH, but when their intracellular levers are increased in hepatoma cells treated repeatedly with prooxidants, they inhibit ALDH3 and bring about growth inhibition or cell death. As a follow up to the work previously reported on S-methyl 4-amino-4-methylpent-2-ynethioate, a synthetic suicide inhibitor of ALDH1, which induced bcl2 overexpressing cells into apoptosis and exhibited an ED50 of 400 muM, a novel broad spectrum inhibitor of ALDH1 and ALDH3 was synthesised. This new compound (ATEM) is a suicide inhibitor of ALDH1, an irreversible inhibitor of ALDH3 and exhibits an ED50 of 10-25 muM on rat cultured hepatoma cells. Four hours after treatment with 25 muM ATEM, ALDH activity using benzaldehyde or propionaldehyde in hepatoma cells was decreased by 40% and cell number by 15% compared with controls. As cell growth did not resume when the inhibitor was removed from the culture medium, it suggested strongly that. ALDHs play a pivotal role in mediating cell death. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据