4.5 Article

High fidelity and lesion bypass capability of human DNA polymerase delta

期刊

BIOCHIMIE
卷 91, 期 9, 页码 1163-1172

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2009.06.007

关键词

DNA polymerase delta; DNA replication fidelity; Proofreading; Lesion bypass synthesis

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 CA102029, R01 CA115802, P01 CA077852, F30 AG030314, T32 GM007266]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA102029, P01CA077852, R01CA115802] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM007266] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [F30AG030314] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA polymerase delta (Pol delta) is one of the main replicative DNA polymerases in human cells and therefore is a critical determinant of the overall accuracy of DNA synthesis. Here we document the fidelity of a human Pol delta holoenzyme and systematically score the types of mutations that the enzyme generates in a forward mutation assay. We find that human Pol delta is highly accurate, catalyzing less than one nucleotide mis-insertion per 220,000 nucleotides polymerized. Inactivation of proofreading or mutation of a conserved active site residue significantly elevates the frequency of incorporation errors, demonstrating the contribution of both the base selection and proofreading domains to the overall accuracy of synthesis by Pol delta. The highly selective nature of the polymerase active site is also indicated by the stalling of Pol delta upon encountering multiple types of DNA lesions. However, DNA damage is not an absolute block to Pol delta progression. We propose that partial lesion bypass by Pol delta represents a balance between stalling to allow for repair of mutagenic lesions by specialized repair proteins and bypass of damage to allow for successful completion of DNA synthesis by Pol delta in the presence of weakly blocking DNA adducts. (C) 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据