4.7 Article

Utility of B-type natriuretic peptide in the diagnosis of congestive heart failure in an urgent-care setting

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01156-6

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives The goal of this study was to evaluate the utility of a rapid bedside technique for measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in the diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF) in an urgent-care setting. Background B-type natriuretic peptide is a protein secreted from the cardiac ventricles in response to pressure overload. One potential application of measurements of BNP in blood is distinguishing dyspnea due to CHF from other causes. Methods B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations were measured in a convenience sample of 250 predominantly male (94%) patients presenting to urgent-care and emergency departments of an academic Veteran's Affairs hospital with dyspnea. Results were withheld from clinicians. Two cardiologists retrospectively reviewed clinical data (blinded to BNP measurements) and reached a consensus opinion on the cause of the patient's symptoms. This gold standard was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the BNP test. Results The mean BNP concentration in the blood of patients with CHF (n = 97) was higher than it was in patients without (1,076 +/- 138 pg/ml vs. 38 +/- 4 pg/ml, p < 0.001). At a blood concentration of 80 pg/ml, BNP was an accurate predictor of the presence of CHF (95%); measurements less than this had a high negative predictive value (98%). The overall C-statistic was 0.97. In multivariate analysis, BNP measurements added significant, independent explanatory power to other clinical variables in models predicting which patients had CHF. The availability of BNP measurements could have potentially corrected 29 of the 30 diagnoses missed by urgent-care physicians. Conclusions B-type natriuretic peptide blood concentration measurement appears to be a sensitive and specific test to diagnose CHF in urgent-care settings. (C) 2001 by the American College of Cardiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据