4.6 Article

Effect of ischemia on intestinal permeability of lipopolysaccharides

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 138-144

出版社

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2001.00792.x

关键词

endotoxin; intestinal absorption; ischemia; lipopolysaccharide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The enteral absorption of endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) was studied in vitro and in vivo. Materials and methods The absorption of fluorescence (FITC) labelled LPS was investigated by uptake studies with rabbit jejunal brush-border membrane vesicles (BBMV), the human intestinal cell line Caco-2 and in rats. Results FITC-LPS from Salmonella typhimurium was taken up into BBMV in a dose-dependent manner. Uptake was neither pH- nor Na+-dependent, nor could it be inhibited by unlabelled LPS. 74.5% of vesicle-associated fluorescence was due to adhesion to the vesicular membranes, 25.5% was taken up into an osmotically-sensitive space. Transport of LPS across Caco-2 cell monolayers was dose-dependent. The permeation rate increased significantly under ischemic conditions, i.e. when the cells were incubated under oxygen-depleted conditions. However, no significant differences in transepithelial electrical resistances were observed between oxygen depleted and control cells. The release of lactate dehydrogenase was only marginally different from control cells, indicating cell integrity. In situ, after gut ischemia, a significantly increased uptake of fluorescent LPS was observed by fluorescence laser scanning microscopy. Conclusion LPS is taken up by the intestinal mucosa, predominantly by passive transcellular diffusion. Under ischemic conditions, the permeability of LPS is increased mainly by an enhanced paracellular permeability and epithelial destruction. The findings partly explain the clinically observed development of multiorgan system failure after temporary malperfusion of the gut during major vascular surgery or thromboembolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据