4.4 Article

Regulation of cardiac calcium current by NO and cGMP-modulating agents

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s004240000475

关键词

calcium current; cGMP heart; muscarinic receptors; nitric oxide; NO scavengers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several effects of nitric oxide (NO) on the control of L-type calcium current (I-Ca) and of calcium handling in cardiomyocytes have been described. Cardiomyocytes have been shown to express in different conditions all types of nitric oxide synthases (NOS), but the role of NO in the regulation of calcium current remains controversial. Previously, we have shown in guinea pig ventricular cells a stimulatory effect of NOS inhibitors on I-Ca. Here we investigate the intracellular mechanisms involved in the putative inhibitory role of NO on basal I-Ca in ventricular cells. The stimulatory effect of the NOS inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA)(1 mM) was present also in calcium transient measurements, but only after a preincubation with L-arginine (L-arg, 0.1 mM). The nitric oxide scavenger 2-phenyl-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (PTIO, 0.5 mM) increased peak I,, in a similar manner to NOS inhibitors in whole-cell voltage-clamp experiments. Also ODQ (1H-[1,2,4]oxidiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxaline-1-one, 0.1 mM), a specific inhibitor of a target of NO, the soluble guanylate cyclase, was able to stimulate I-Ca. The block of type II phosphodiesterase (cGMP-activated) by EHNA (erythro-9-[2-hydroxy-3-nonyl]adenine, 30 muM) exerted a similar effect on I-Ca as PTIO and ODQ. Carbachol (CCh, 1 muM) was able to revert the stimulatory effect on I-Ca observed with PTIO, ODQ, and EHNA. We propose that the increase of basal I-Ca in guinea pig cardiomyocytes previously observed with L-NMMA depends on the removal of a tonic NO inhibition. This increase of I-Ca is mimicked by blocking at different steps the cGMP-cascade activated by NO, suggesting a NO-guanylate cyclase mechanism in the basal control of ventricular calcium current.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据