4.7 Article

Mechanisms of arsenic adsorption on amorphous oxides evaluated using macroscopic measurements, vibrational spectroscopy, and surface complexation modeling

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 234, 期 1, 页码 204-216

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2000.7295

关键词

arsenate; arsenite; amorphous aluminum oxide; amorphous iron oxide; FTIR spectroscopy; Raman spectroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arsenic adsorption on amorphous aluminum and iron oxides was investigated as a function of solution pH, solution ionic strength, and redox state. In this study in situ Raman and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic methods were combined with sorption techniques, electrophoretic mobility measurements, and surface complexation modeling to study the interaction of As(III) and As(V) with amorphous oxide surfaces. The speciation of As(III) and As(V) in aqueous solution was examined using Raman and attenuated total reflectance (ATR)-FTIR methods as a function of solution pH. The position of the As-O stretching bands, for both As(III) and As(V), are strongly pH dependent. Assignment of the observed As-O bands and their shift in position with pH was confirmed using semiempirical molecular orbital calculations. Similar pH-dependent frequency shifts are observed in the vibrational bands of As species sorbed on amorphous Al and Fe oxides, The mechanisms of As sorption to these surfaces based on the spectroscopic, sorption, and electrophoretic mobility measurements are as follows: arsenate forms inner-sphere surface complexes on both amorphous Al and Fe oxide while arsenite forms both inner- and outer-sphere surface complexes on amorphous Fe oxide and outer-sphere surface complexes on amorphous Al oxide. These surface configurations were used to constrain the input parameters of the surface complexation models. Inclusion of microscopic and macroscopic experimental results is a powerful technique that maximizes chemical significance of the modeling approach. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据