4.7 Article

Classification of sleep-disordered breathing

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.2.9808132

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR00096] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL53931] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing recognition of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and its morbidity have prompted reevaluation of techniques to identify respiratory events during sleep. The present study was designed to evaluate the utility of various metrics of SDB and to identify the optimal respiratory metric that objectively correlates to symptoms of excessive daytime somnolence (EDS). Metrics were derived from combinations of conventional apnea/hypopnea, flow limitation events (transient elevated upper airway resistance identified by characteristic flattening on the flow/time tracing, using a noninvasive nasal cannula technique), desaturation, and arousal. A total of 137 subjects underwent clinical evaluation and nocturnal polysomnogram. In 34 randomly selected subjects, the best metrics for discriminating between 13 subjects with no EDS/snoring and 21 patients with EDS and snoring were identified by receiver operator curve analysis. Of the metrics and cut points tested, a total respiratory disturbance index (RDITotal, sum of apneas, hypopnea, and flow limitation events) of 18 events/h was found to have the best discriminant ability (100% sensitivity and 96% specificity). Prospective testing of this metric was then performed with the remaining 103 subjects (14 nonsnoring non-EDS, 21 snoring non-EDS, 68 snoring with EDS). Using this cutoff of 18 events/h, we obtained 71% sensitivity and 60% specificity for identifying subjects with EDS. We conclude that, in subjects with upper airway dysfunction, an index that incorporates all respiratory events provides the best quantitative physiological correlate to EDS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据