4.7 Article

Paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin as salvage treatment in refractory small-cell lung cancer (SCLC): A multicenter phase II study

期刊

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 193-197

出版社

KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008322932251

关键词

carboplatin; paclitaxel; salvage treatment; SCLC

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The activity and toxicity of paclitaxel plus carboplatin combination in patients with disease progression after initial chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) was investigated in a multicenter phase II study. Patients and methods: Thirty-two patients (twenty-seven men) with extensive stage refractory SCLC after EP or CAV front-line chemotherapy were treated with paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) on day 1 and carboplatin 6 AUC on day 2 in a four-week schedule. The patients' median age was 60 years and the performance status (WHO) was 0 for 9, 1 for 20 and 2 for 3 patients. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 29 for response. Results: Complete response was observed in one (3%) and partial response in seven (22%) for an overall response rate of 25% (95% confidence interval (CI): 10%-40%). Seven (22%) patients had stable disease and seventeen (53%) progressive disease. All but one of the responders had been previously treated with EP combination and three of them had failed to respond. The median duration of response and the median TTP were 3 and 5.5 months, respectively. The median overall survival was seven months. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 12 (37%) patients and in 2 of these it was associated with infection. There were no toxic deaths. Grade 4 anaemia was observed in one (3%) patient and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in three (9.4%). Non-hematologic toxicity was very mild with grade 2-3 asthenia occurring in 10 (25%) patients; asthenia was the reason for treatment discontinuation in 3 patients. Conclusions: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is a relatively active and well-tolerated regimen as salvage treatment in patients with refractory SCLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据