4.6 Article

Colorimetric detection of sequence-specific microRNA based on duplex-specific nuclease-assisted nanoparticle amplification

期刊

ANALYST
卷 140, 期 18, 页码 6306-6312

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5an01350j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21335003, 21205040]
  2. Science Fund for Creative Research Groups [21421004]
  3. Key Grant Project of Chinese Ministry of Education [313019]
  4. Shanghai Fund [12ZR1442700]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  6. Hitachi, Ltd

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Developing simple and rapid methods for sequence-specific microRNA (miRNA) analysis is imperative to the miRNA study and use in clinical diagnosis. We have developed a colorimetric method for miRNA detection based on duplex-specific nuclease (DSN)-assisted signal amplification coupled to the aggregation of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). The proposed method involves two processes: target-mediated probe digestion by a DSN enzyme and probe-triggered AuNP aggregation as a switch for signal output. The reaction system consists of a rationally designed probe complex formed by two partly complementary DNA probes, and two sets of different oligonucleotide-modified AuNPs with sequences complementary to a DNA probe in the probe complex. In the presence of target miRNA, the probe complex is invaded, resulting in the formation of a miRNA-probe heteroduplex as the substrate of the DSN enzyme, and releasing the other probe to link to the AuNPs. The proposed method allows quantitative detection of miR-122 in the range of 20 pM to 1 nM with a detection limit of similar to 16 pM, and shows an excellent ability to discriminate single-base differences. Moreover, the detection assay can be applied to accurately quantify miR-122 in cancerous cell lysates which is in excellent agreement with the results from a commercial miRNA detection kit. This method is simple, cost-effective, highly selective, and free of dye label and separation procedures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据