4.3 Review

Carboxysomal carbonic anhydrases: Structure and role in microbial CO2 fixation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2009.09.026

关键词

Carboxysome; Carbonic anhydrase; CO2-concentrating mechanism; Cyanobacteria; Chemoautotrophs

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [MCB-0818680, MCB-0851070]
  2. NSF [MCB-0444568]
  3. US Department of Energy's Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program
  4. University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DEAC52-07NA27344]
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences
  7. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [0818680] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences [0851070, 0851094] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cyanobacteria and some chemoautotrophic bacteria are able to grow in environments with limiting CO2. concentrations by employing a CO2-concentrating mechanism (CCM) that allows them to accumulate inorganic carbon in their cytoplasm to concentrations several orders of magnitude higher than that on the outside. The final step of this process takes place in polyhedral protein microcompartments known as carboxysomes, which contain the majority of the CO2-fixing enzyme, RubisCO. The efficiency of CO2 fixation by the sequestered RubisCO is enhanced by co-localization with a specialized carbonic anhydrase that catalyzes dehydration of the cytoplasmic bicarbonate and ensures saturation of RubisCO with its substrate, CO2. There are two genetically distinct carboxysome types that differ in their protein composition and in the carbonic anhydrase(s) they employ. Here we review the existing information concerning the genomics, structure and enzymology of these uniquely adapted carbonic anhydrases, which are of fundamental importance in the global carbon cycle. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据