4.7 Article

Endothelial dysfunction in patients with chronic heart failure: Systemic effects of lower-limb exercise training

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01108-6

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives We sought to analyze the systemic effects of lower-limb exercise training (ET) on radial artery endothelial function in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Background Local ET has the potential to improve loca: endothelial dysfunction in patients with CHF. However, it remains; unclear whether the systemic effects can be achieved by local ET. Methods Twenty-two male patients with CHF were prospectively randomized to either ET on a bicycle ergometer (ET group, n = 11; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 26 +/- 3%) or an inactive control group (group C, n = 11; LVEF 24 +/- 2%). At the beginning of the study and alter four weeks, endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation of the radial artery was determined by intra-arterial infusion of acetylcholine (ACh-7.5, 15 and 30 mug/min) and nitroglycerin (0.2 mg/min). The mean internal diameter (ID) of the radial artery was assessed using a high resolution ultrasound system (NIUS-02, Asulab Research Laboratories, Neuchatel,Switzerland) with a 10-MHz probe. Results After four weeks of ET, patients showed a significant increase in ID in response to ACh (30 mug/min), from 33 +/- 10 to 127 +/- 25 mum (p < 0.001 vs. control group at four weeks). In the control group, the response to ACh (30 g/min) remained unchanged. Endothelium-independent vasodilation was similar in both groups at the beginning of the study and at four weeks. In the training group, increases in agonist-mediated, endothelium-dependent vasodilation correlated to changes in functional work capacity (r = 0.63, p < 0.05). Conclusions In patients with stable CHF, bicycle ergometer ET leads to a correction of endothelial dysfunction of the upper extremity, indicating a systemic effect of local ET on endothelial function. (C) 2001 by the American College of Cardiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据