3.8 Article

Differentiation of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus via genotypic and phenotypic profiles from three different populations

期刊

ORAL MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 16-23

出版社

MUNKSGAARD INT PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-302x.2001.160103.x

关键词

DNA fingerprint; AP-PCR; S. mutans; S. sobrinus

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE-11147, DE-09082] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Routine identification of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus is generally based upon growth on various selective media, colony morphology and biochemical characteristics. We examined various approaches of differentiating these two species through a combination of the conventional phenotypic methodology with chromosomal DNA fingerprint (CDF) and arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR) methods. Initially, ten ATCC type strains and 20 randomly selected clinical isolates of mutans streptococci (MS) were characterized and grouped into two major types based on patterns generated by the CDF using HaeIII digestion. The CDF's patterns with restriction fragments equal to or greater than 6.6 kb were defined as the CDF-1 group. The CDF's patterns with restriction fragments less than 6.6 kb were defined as the CDF-2 group. Both groups were then examined for biotype, serotype, and composition of DNA via thermal denaturation. AP-PCR was applied and evaluated for the capability of delineating S. mutans from S. sobrinus strains. Results of this study showed that all CDF-1 strains fit within a G+C range of 36.2% to 42.2%, whereas the CDF-2 strains had a G+C range of 45.8% to 47.0%. The serotyping assay exhibited 100% sensitivity, 90% specificity and 86.7% agreement with the CDF. The biotyping assay presented the poorest specificity (38.5%), indicating the highest variability. The capability of AP-PCR in differentiation of S. mutans from S. sobrinus was comparable to the CDF method, suggesting that either of these two approaches can and may serve as a viable alternative method to serotyping or biotyping of MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据