4.7 Article

Flow-induced constriction in arterioles of hyperhomocysteinemic rats is due to impaired nitric oxide and enhanced thromboxane A2 mediation

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.21.2.233

关键词

homocysteine; arteriole; flow-induced response; endothelium; nitric oxide; thromboxane A(2)

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-46813, HL-43023] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy) is thought to promote arteriosclerosis and peripheral arterial disease, in part by impairing the function of endothelium. Because flow-induced dilation is mediated by the endothelium, we hypothesized that HHcy alters this response by interfering with the synthesis/action of NO and prostaglandins. Thus, changes in the diameter of isolated, pressurized (at 80 mm Hg) gracilis skeletal muscle arterioles (diameter approximate to 170 mum) from control and methionine diet-induced HHcy rats were investigated with videomicroscopy. Increases in intraluminal flow (from 0 to 25 muL/min) resulted in dilations of control arterioles (maximum, 34 +/-4 mum). In contrast, increases in flow elicited constrictions of HHcy arterioles (-36 +/-3 mum). In control arterioles, the NO synthase inhibitor N-omega-nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester significantly attenuated (approximate to 50%) dilation, whereas the additional administration of indomethacin, an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase, eliminated flow-induced dilation. In the arterioles of III-icy rats, flow-induced constriction was not affected by N-omega-nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester, whereas it was abolished by indomethacin or the prostaglandin H-2/thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2)) receptor antagonist SQ 29,548 or the TXA(2) synthase inhibitor CGS 13,080. Thus, in HHcy, increases in intraluminal flow elicit constrictions of skeletal muscle arterioles due to the impaired NO and enhanced TXA(2) mediation of the response, alterations that likely contribute to the development of peripheral arterial disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据