4.6 Review

Review on Ion Mobility Spectrometry. Part 1: current instrumentation

期刊

ANALYST
卷 140, 期 5, 页码 1376-1390

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4an01100g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [MICINN-TEC2007-67962-C04, MICIIN-TEC2010-21357-C05]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) within the Collaborative Research Centre [(Sonderforschungsbereich) SFB 876]
  3. Hartwell Foundation
  4. National Science Foundation [1255915]
  5. National Centre for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the NIH [UL1 TR000002]
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1255915] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1255915] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ion Mobility Spectrometry (IMS) is a widely used and 'well-known' technique of ion separation in the gaseous phase based on the differences in ion mobilities under an electric field. All IMS instruments operate with an electric field that provides space separation, but some IMS instruments also operate with a drift gas flow that provides also a temporal separation. In this review we will summarize the current IMS instrumentation. IMS techniques have received an increased interest as new instrumentation and have become available to be coupled with mass spectrometry (MS). For each of the eight types of IMS instruments reviewed it is mentioned whether they can be hyphenated with MS and whether they are commercially available. Finally, out of the described devices, the six most-consolidated ones are compared. The current review article is followed by a companion review article which details the IMS hyphenated techniques (mainly gas chromatography and mass spectrometry) and the factors that make the data from an IMS device change as a function of device parameters and sampling conditions. These reviews will provide the reader with an insightful view of the main characteristics and aspects of the IMS technique.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据