4.7 Article

Xanthophyll synthesis in diatoms: quantification of putative intermediates and comparison of pigment conversion kinetics with rate constants derived from a model

期刊

PLANTA
卷 212, 期 3, 页码 382-391

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s004250000403

关键词

beta-cryptoxanthin; beta-cryptoxanthin epoxide; carotenoid biosynthesis (kinetic model); diatom; xanthophyll cycle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, we reported the presence of the violaxanthin-antheraxanthin-zeaxanthin cycle in diatoms, and showed that violaxanthin is the putative precursor of both diadinoxanthin and fucoxanthin in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum Bohlin (M. Lohr and C. Wilhelm, 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 8784-8789). In the present study, two possible intermediates in the synthesis of violaxanthin from beta -carotene were Introduction identified in P. tricornutum, namely beta -cryptoxanthin and beta -cryptoxanthin epoxide. In low light, the latter pigment prevails, but in high light beta -cryptoxanthin accumulates, probably as the result of an increased activity of the xantophyll-cycle de-epoxidase. The apparent kinetics of several xanthophyll conversion steps were determined for P. tricornutum and Cyclotella meneghiniana Kutzing. The experimentally determined conversion rates were used to evaluate the hypothetical pathway of xanthophyll synthesis in diatoms. For this purpose a mathematical model was developed which allows the calculation of theoretical rates of pigment conversion for microalgae under steady-state growth conditions. A comparison between measured and calculated conversion rates agreed well with the proposal of a sequential synthesis of fucoxanthin via violaxanthin and diadinoxanthin. The postulation of zeaxanthin as an obligatory intermediate in the synthesis of violaxanthin, however, resulted in large discrepancies between the measured and calculated rates of its epoxidation. Instead of zeaxanthin, beta -cryptoxanthin epoxide may be involved in the biosynthesis of violaxanthin in diatoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据