4.7 Article

Inhibition of Wnt activity induces heart formation from posterior mesoderm

期刊

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 316-327

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.855501

关键词

crescent; Dkk-1; Wnt; heart induction; endoderm; erythropoiesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the chick, heart mesoderm is induced by signals from the anterior endoderm. Although BMP-2 is expressed in the anterior endoderm, BMP activity is necessary but not sufficient for heart formation. Previous work from our lab has suggested that one or more additional factors from anterior endoderm are required. Crescent is a Frizzled-related protein that inhibits Wnt-8c and is expressed in anterior endoderm during gastrulation. At the same stages, expression of Wnt-3a and Wnt-8c is restricted to the primitive streak and posterior lateral plate, and is absent from the anterior region where crescent is expressed. Posterior lateral plate mesoderm normally forms blood, but coculture of this tissue with anterior endoderm or infection with RCAS-crescent induces formation of beating heart muscle and represses formation of blood. Dkk-1, a Wnt inhibitor of a different protein family, similarly induces heart-specific gene expression in posterior lateral plate mesoderm. Furthermore, we have found that ectopic Wnt signals can repress heart formation from anterior mesoderm in vitro and in vivo and that forced expression of either Wnt-3a or Wnt-8c can promote development of primitive erythrocytes from the precardiac region. We conclude that inhibition of Wnt signaling promotes heart formation in the anterior lateral mesoderm, whereas active Wnt signaling in the posterior lateral mesoderm promotes blood development. We propose a model in which two orthogonal gradients, one of Wnt activity along the anterior-posterior axis and the other of BMP signals along the dorsal-ventral axis, intersect in the heart-forming region to induce cardiogenesis in a region of high BMP and low Wnt activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据