4.5 Article

Circular scanlines and circular windows: new tools for characterizing the geometry of fracture traces

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY
卷 23, 期 2-3, 页码 247-258

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8141(00)00094-8

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce new estimators for fracture trace intensity, trace density and mean trace length that exploit the use of circles as efficient sampling tools. A fracture trace ii the commonly observed surface expression of a fracture. i.e. the intersection of a fracture with an exposed surface such as a rock pavement or a mine drive wall. Trace intensity, trace density and mean trace length estimators are derived and shown to Form a self-consistent set of two-dimensional fracture abundance measures. The intensity estimator n/4r uses the number, n. of intersections between fracture traces and a circular scanline of radius r. The density estimator m/2 pir(2) uses the number, in, of tract endpoints inside a circular window. The mean tract length estimator (n/m) pir/2 uses the ratio of the number of trace intersections on the circle to the number of endpoints in the circle. The circular sampling tools and estimators described here eliminate most sampling biases due to orientation and also correct many errors due to censoring and length bias that plague established scanline and areal measurement techniques. Performance of the estimators ii demonstrated by comparison with areal samples of a synthetic fracture trace population with known intensity, density and mean trace length. The estimators are also applied successfully to a natural rock pavement with two orthogonal fracture sets, one of which is severely censored. Because the new circle-based estimators only require counts of trace-circle intersections and/or trace endpoints. they are more time-efficient than current methods for estimating geometric characteristics of fracture traces. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据