4.5 Article

Risedronate pharmacokinetics and intra- and inter-subject variability upon single-dose intravenous and oral administration

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 166-170

出版社

KLUWER ACADEMIC/PLENUM PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1011024200280

关键词

bioavailability; intrasubject variability; pharmacokinetics; risedronate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose. To determine the pharmacokinetics and absolute bioavailability of risedronate after single-dose oral administration of 30 mg risedronate as a tablet and an aqueous solution, and 0.3 mg risedronate as an intravenous infusion. Methods. This study was a randomized, three-treatment, four-period, partial replicate crossover study involving 33 healthy volunteers. Treatments were administered 7 weeks apart, and the third treatment was repeated during the fourth period. Serum and urine were collected over 72 hours and 672 hours, respectively. Results. Following intravenous administration, renal clearance accounted for 87% of total clearance, with 65% of the dose excreted within 24 hours and 85% of the dose excreted within four weeks. The absolute bioavailability was approximately 0.62% after both oral formulations, and the relative bioavailability of the tablet compared with the oral solution was 104%. The rate and extent of absorption from the two formulations were bioequivalent based on the range proposed for highly variable drugs. Intrasubject variability following oral administration was 50-80%, and was primarily associated with absorption. Conclusion. The majority of the total clearance after intravenous administration of risedronate was renal clearance, indicating that only a small percentage of a systemic dose is potentially incorporated, or cleared, into bone. The absolute bioavailability of orally administered risedronate is similar to0.6%, and is independent of formulation. Variability in the pharmacokinetics following oral administration is primarily associated with intrasubject variability in absorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据