4.7 Article

Human epidermal Langerhans' cells are targets for the immunosuppressive macrolide tacrolimus (FK506)

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 107, 期 2, 页码 345-352

出版社

MOSBY, INC
DOI: 10.1067/mai.2001.112600

关键词

atopic dermatitis; beta-methasone valerate; costimulatory molecules; dendritic cells; FK506; FKBP; skin immune system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The immunosuppressive macrolide tacrolimus (FK506) has been shown to inhibit allergic contact dermatitis in animal models as well as in human beings. More recently, successful treatment of atopic dermatitis with an ointment containing tacrolimus has been reported. Objectives: We explored the effects of this compound on epidermal Langerhans' cells (LCs), which are known to play an important pathophysiologic role in inflammatory skin diseases. Methods: The expression of the intracellular FK506 binding protein (FKBP12) was monitored on freshly isolated and cultured epidermal LCs. Phenotyping and functional exploration of LCs treated with different concentrations of tacrolimus and beta -methasone valerate (beta Mv) were performed. Results: FKBP12 is expressed in freshly isolated LCs but is lost while they are maturating into mature dendritic cells. Tacrolimus inhibited the expression of IL-2R (CD25) and of the costimulatory molecules CD80 (B7.1) and CD40, Expression of MHC class I and II was also affected, whereas (3D86 (B7.2) expression was not altered. In contrast, beta Mv strongly increased the expression of CD25. Paradoxically, while decreasing CD40 and MHC class I expression, beta Mv significantly increased the expression of MHC class II, CD80, and CD86 on cultured LCs but impaired their allostimulatory activity. Tacrolimus was about 100 times more potent than beta Mv at inhibiting LC stimulatory function. Conclusion: Tacrolimus can exert immunopharmacologic alterations on LCs, which may account, at least in part, for the therapeutic effect of this compound in eczematous skin diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据