4.0 Article

Pretransplant varicella vaccination is cost-effective in pediatric renal transplantation

期刊

PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 44-50

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3046.2001.00032.x

关键词

children; renal transplantation varicella; immunization; costs and cost analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Because of the severe complications that may result from varicella tester virus (VZV) infection following renal transplantation (Tx), transplanted varicella-susceptible children exposed to varicella are typically given varicella tester immunoglobulin (VZIG) as prophylaxis or are admitted and treated with parenteral acyclovir if VZIG prophylaxis fails. As both VZIG and hospitalization are costly, prevention of varicella infection by vaccination could potentially result in significant cost savings in addition to decreasing morbidity and mortality. To test this hypothesis, we developed a decision-analysis model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vaccinating patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) against varicella prior to renal transplant. Under baseline assumptions, vaccination for varicella pretransplant was a cost-effective strategy, with a cost of $211 per patient vaccinated compared with $1,828 per patient not vaccinated. The magnitude of cost savings from vaccination was sensitive to variations in the cost of varicella vaccine, the percentage of patients hospitalized for treatment with acyclovir, and the percentage of patients exposed to varicella infection. One- and two-way sensitivity analyses confirmed that vaccination was the dominant cost-effective strategy under all conditions examined. We conclude that vaccination for varicella pretransplant is cost-effective for patients with CRF, and that the magnitude of cost savings is sensitive to the cost of hospitalization, the percentage of patients exposed to varicella, and the cost of varicella vaccination. Pending results of ongoing studies of the safety and efficacy of VZV vaccine in children with CRF, we recommend that VZV vaccine be given to all children with CRF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据