3.8 Article

Interferon beta-1b and intravenous methylprednisolone promote lesion recovery in multiple sclerosis

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 49-58

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1177/135245850100700109

关键词

multiple sclerosis; intravenous methylprednisolone; MRI; magnetization transfer imaging; interferon beta-1b gadolinium; contrast enhancing lesions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine whether lesion evolution in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients is altered by treatment with interferon beta -1b (IFN beta -1b) or by intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) as measured by magnetization transfer imaging Methods: Magnetization transfer ratios (MTR) of 225 contrast enhancing lesions (CEL), in four RRMS patients were serially determined for 12 months before and 12-18 months after contrast enhancement in a baseline vs treatment trial with IFN beta -1b. During the baseline period 185 new CEL were identified: 76 were treated with IVMP (1 g/day x 5 days) and designated steroid CEL (S-CEL); the remaining 109 were considered baseline lesions (B-CEL). During IFN beta -1b treatment, 40 CEL (IFN-CEL) were identified. After image co-registration, regions of interest (ROIs) defining new CEL were transferred to the MTR image set to determine the mean lesion MTR on each monthly exam. The lesion MTR was compared to MTR of normal appearing white matter (NAWM) on the some exam. Results: As early os IZ months prior to enhancement the MTR of CEL was reduced compared to NAWM (mean 9.43 +/- 3.2%; P< 0.001). The further reduction in MTR (28% 4.0) at the time of contrast enhancement was not significantly different for B-CEL S-CEL or IFN-CEL Following enhancement lesion recovery for IFN-CEL (P=0.02) and S-CEL (P=0.002) was significantly higher than B-CEL Conclusion: IFN beta -1b and IVMP reduce tissue damage and promote lesion recovery in RRMS patients. The additional benefit of IVMP compared to IFN beta -1b may be related to its inhibitory effect on demyelination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据