4.2 Article

Ripening-associated microstructural changes in antisense ACC synthase tomato fruit

期刊

出版社

TECHNOMIC PUBL CO INC
DOI: 10.1106/MARW-6NUR-GU3H-D2EL

关键词

cell wall enzymes; ethylene; firmness; Lycopersicon esculentum; organelles; pigments; ripening

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ultrastructural impact of low ethylene biosynthesis ( less than 0.5% of normal levels) was evaluated in transgenic (A11.1) tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) expressing an antisense 1-aminocyclopropane-1- carboxylic acid synthase (ACC-S) transgene by means of transmission and environmental scanning electron microscopy. In 48-day mature green fruit, no significant ultrastructural differences were found between transgenic and control tomatoes. In 78-day control fruit, which were overripe and showed deteriorated texture, many areas of the cytoplasm were devoid of structures, and micrographs showed cell collapse with folding and dissolution of the cell wall. On the other hand, in 90-day transgenic fruit, which were firm and not ripe, the cytoplasm showed a relatively high electron density. Plastids retained remnants of chloroplast thylakoids along with significant amounts of osmiophylic plastoglobuli, but lycopene was not detected. Conspicuous starch granules were observed in mature green transgenic tomatoes, but were not detected in 90-day chlorochromoplasts. Electron-dense regions reflecting the integrity of the middle lamella alternated with other partially degraded regions. This incipient dissolution of the middle lamella pectic polymers may be attributable to nonenzymatic deaggregation or to cell-wall hydrolases which could be ethylene independent or responsive to very low levels of ethylene. Besides, cells were attached along extended contact areas and appeared turgid. This feature may provide an explanation of firmness retention that does not solely involve cell walls. Disruption of the middle lamella and development of lycopene crystalloids were observed when exogenous ethylene (12 ppm) was applied.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据