4.6 Article

Reef corals, zooxanthellae and free-living algae, a microcosm study that demonstrates synergy between calcification and primary production

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 443-457

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00066-5

关键词

microcosm; coral reefs; calcification; photosynthesis; algae; corals; synergy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A mature, high-biodiversity coral reef microcosm and its chambered subsets were used to examine the relationship between calcification and photosynthesis and its most critical biotic components. Whole ecosystem calcification at 4.0 +/- 0.2 kg (40 +/- 2 mol) CaCO3 m(-2) year(-1) is related to its primary components (stony coral 17.6%, Halimeda 7.4%, Tridacna 9.0%, algal turf, coralline and foraminifera 29.4%, and miscellaneous invertebrates 36%). Through analysis of the microcosm's daily carbonate system, it is demonstrated that bicarbonate ion, not carbonate ion, is the principal component of total alkalinity reduction in the water column (thus, bicarbonate ion is the principal measured component of calcification as normally measured on reef transects). While chamber-isolated free-living algae remove carbon dioxide, and raise pH and carbonate ion equivalent to that in the microcosm as a whole, no total alkalinity reduction (calcification) occurs. On the other hand, chamber isolated stony corals remove considerable bicarbonate, with very little pH or carbonate ion elevation: Combining the non-calcifying free-living macroalgae Chondria with stony corals in chamber subsets, it is possible to remove more carbon dioxide (elevating pH) and thereby increase coral calcification rates by 60 and 120% above zooxanthellae-mediated rates to 20.6 kg (206 mol) and 18.5 kg (185 mol) CaCO3 m(-2) year(-1) for Acropora and Montipora, respectively. These findings, which support the McConnaughey and Whelan hypothesis of bicarbonate ion neutralization in coral calcification, are easily demonstrated in the controlled microcosm environment. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据