4.7 Review

Role of oxidants in the signaling pathway of preconditioning

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 3-10

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/152308601750100425

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review focuses on the possible role of reactive oxygen species in the pathogenesis of this phenomenon. Evidence in support of a role of oxidants in preconditioning has come from the observation that administration of oxygen radical scavengers during the reperfusion period following the initial preconditioning ischemia could prevent the phenomenon. In addition, a brief exposure to a low, nontoxic dose of oxygen radicals may reproduce the beneficial effects of ischemic preconditioning, thus suggesting that radicals can directly trigger the preconditioning pathway. To explain the effects of oxidants in this setting, it has been suggested that reperfusion after the initial, preconditioning ischemic episode results in the generation of relatively low amounts of oxygen radicals, which are insufficient to determine cell necrosis, but nevertheless could modify cellular activities that have been implicated as mediators of the preconditioning phenomenon. Recent evidence suggests that low levels of oxidants may have a modulatory role on several cell functions. Possible mechanisms of oxidant-mediated protection might be protein kinase C and other kinases, ATP-dependent potassium channels, or changes in sulfhydryl group redox state, while an effect on adenosine metabolism, or the induction of myocardial stunning presumably does not contribute to oxidant-mediated preconditioning. Finally, de novo protein synthesis and gene expression, and increased antioxidant defenses might be involved in the late phase of preconditioning. In summary, available data strongly suggest that oxygen radicals might be possible mediators of preconditioning. However, further investigation is required to clearly elucidate their exact role and mechanisms of action.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据