4.7 Article

Survival of hepatitis A virus on modified atmosphere-packaged (MAP) lettuce

期刊

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 95-102

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1006/fmic.2000.0380

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experiments were designed to study the effect of various modified atmospheres (MA) on the survival rate of hepatitis A virus (HAV) on lettuce. Pieces of lettuce inoculated with HAV were incubated at room temperature (RT) and 4 degreesC for 12 days in ambient air and under various modified atmospheres (CO2:N-2 at 30:70, 50:50, 70:30 and 100% CO2) inside plastic bags of low O-2 permeability. Samples were removed on days 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 and the virus was recovered and plaque-assayed to determine residual titer. incubation for 12 days at 4 degreesC showed that the lowest HAV survival rate (47.5%) was on lettuce stored in a petri-dish (atmospheric air), whereas the greatest survival rates (83.6%) was on lettuce stored under 70% CO2. Statistical analysis of virus survival at 4 degreesC indicated that HAV titers decreased for all packages, but without a significant (P > 0.05) difference between the package types. Ar RT; however, a significantly (P < 0.05) lower HAV survival rate (0.01%) was evident on lettuce stored in a petri dish, whereas survival rates as high as 42.8% were observed on lettuce stored under 70% CO2, much lower survival rates (8.6%) were obtained on lettuce stored under other MAP environments at RT: Statistical analysis of the RT data indicated that there was a highly significant (P < 0.05) decrease in HAV titre with,increasing storage time and between package types, except for lettuce stored under 70% CO2. These data indicate that MAP does not influence HAV survival when present on the surface of produce incubated at 4C. A slight improvement,in virus survival on lettuce was seen in the presence of high CO2 levels at RT This may have been attributed to the inhibition of spoilage-causing enzymatic activities in the lettuce, which may have reduced exposure of the virus to (C) 2001 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据