4.7 Article

Gas flow and heat transfer through catalyst filled tubes

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES
卷 40, 期 2, 页码 152-164

出版社

EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1290-0729(00)01204-7

关键词

fixed bed reactor; modeling; fluid flow; bypass behaviour; effective viscosity; heat transfer; effective radial (heat) conductivity; wall heat transfer coefficient; radial flow distribution; fixed-bed adsorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A detailed knowledge of the fluid flow profile and of the radial heat transfer parameters is essential for a proper design of fixed-bed processes. For different sphere, ring and cylinder catalysts radial velocity profiles were measured below the fixed-bed at empty tube velocities of air between 0.5 m.s(-1) < (0) < 1.5 m.s(-1) and tube to particle diameter ratios 3.3 < d(t)/d(p) < 11. As a consequence of the statistical behaviour of packings, it was necessary to average velocity measurements after repacking in order to obtain representative flow profiles. All profiles show a velocity maximum in the vicinity of the wall, in order to relate the measured profiles below the packing to the velocity profiles inside the packing, model simulations have been performed. The model is based on the extended Brinkman equation and the independently determined radial void fraction profiles. It considers an effective viscosity for which correlations have been derived for spheres, cylinders and rings. Radial heat transfer parameters were obtained experimentally from packings between two parallel plates of different temperatures. The determined heat transfer parameters can be transformed to the round cross section of a tube by considering the respective radial velocity profiles. The transformed values of the effective heat conductivity could be well described by literature correlations. For the heat transfer coefficient at the wall a new correlation was developed. (C) 2001 Editions scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据