4.5 Article

Early Archean fossil bacteria and biofilms in hydrothermally-influenced sediments from the Barberton greenstone belt, South Africa

期刊

PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH
卷 106, 期 1-2, 页码 93-116

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-9268(00)00127-3

关键词

Early Archean; fossil bacteria; biofilm; hydrothermal actvity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SEM imaging of HF-etched, 3.3-3.5 Ga cherts from the Onverwacht Group, South Africa reveals small spherical (1 mum diameter) and rod-shaped structures (2-3.8 mum in length) which are interpreted as probable fossil coccoid and bacillar bacteria (prokaryotes), respectively, preserved by mineral replacement. Other, possibly biogenic structures include smaller rod-shaped bacteriomorphs ( < 2 m in length) and bacteriomorph moulds. The identification of these structures as fossil bacteria is based on size, shape, cell division, distribution in colonies and occurrence in biolaminated sediments. The exceptionally fine conservation has preserved textures such as wrinkled outer walls on the coccoid fossils, while the bacillar fossils are turgid. Carbon isotope analyses support the presence of bacteria in these cherts with one delta C-13 Value around - 27 per mil. The cherts are characterised by fine, wavy laminae created by granular to smooth or ropy-textured films coating bedding planes, interpreted as probable bacterial biofilms, which have also been pseudomorphed by minerals. Although most of the Onverwacht Group was deposited in relatively deep water (> 900 m), textures in the sediments in which these biogenic structures occur suggest that they were probably deposited in a shallow water environment which was subjected to intermittent subaerial exposure. Pervasive hydrothermal activity is evidenced by oxygen isotope studies as well as the penecontemporaneous silicification of all rock types by low temperature (less than or equal to 220 degreesC) hydrothermal solutions. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据