4.8 Article

The role of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, intestinal permeability, endotoxaemia, and tumour necrosis factor α in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

期刊

GUT
卷 48, 期 2, 页码 206-211

出版社

BRITISH MED JOURNAL PUBL GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/gut.48.2.206

关键词

non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; small intestinal bacterial overgrowth; intestinal permeability; endotoxin; tumour necrosis factor alpha

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth may contribute to the development of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, perhaps by increasing intestinal permeability and promoting the absorption endotoxin or other enteric bacterial products. Aims-To investigate the prevalence small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, increased intestinal permeability, elevated endotoxin, and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) levels in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and in control subjects. Patients and methods-Twenty two patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and 23 control subjects were studied. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth was assessed by a combined C-14-D-xylose and lactulose breath test. Intestinal permeability was assessed by a dual lactuloserhamnose sugar test. Serum endotoxin levels were determined using the limulus amoebocyte lysate assay and TNF-alpha levels using an ELISA. Results-Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth was present in 50% of patients with non-alcoholic steatosis and 22% of control subjects (p=0.048). Mean TNF-alpha levels in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis patients and control subjects were 14.2 and 7.5 pg/ml, respectively (p=0.001). Intestinal permeability and serum endotoxin levels were similar in the two groups. Conclusions-Patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis have a higher prevalence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, as assessed by the C-14-D -xylose-lactulose breath test, and higher TNF-alpha levels in comparison with control subjects. This is not accompanied by increased intestinal permeability or elevated endotoxin levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据