4.7 Article

Overexpression of HSPA12B protects against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury via a PI3K/Akt-dependent mechanism

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.10.003

关键词

Cerebral ischemia/reperfusion; Heat shock protein A12B (HSPA12B); PI3K/Alct signaling; Apoptosis; Neuroprotective agent

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30972856, 81071752, 81071067, 81170321]
  2. Jiangsu Province's Outstanding Medical Academic Leader program [LJ201124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose: HSPA12B is a newly discovered member of the Hsp70 family proteins. This study investigated the effects of HSPA12B on focal cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (UR) injury in mice. Methods: Transgenic mice overexpressing human HSPA12B (Tg) and wild-type littermates (WT) were subjected to 60 mm of middle cerebral artery occlusion to induce ischemia and followed by reperfusion (I/R). Neurological deficits, infarct volumes and neuronal death were examined at 6 and 24 hrs after reperfusion. Blood-brain-barrier (BBB) integrity and activated cellular signaling were examined at 3 hrs after reperfusion. Results: After cerebral I/R, Tg mice exhibited improvement in neurological deficits and decrease in infarct volumes, when compared with WT I/R mice. BBB integrity was significantly preserved in Tg mice following cerebral I/R Tg mice also showed significant decreases in cell injury and apoptosis in the ischemic hemispheres. We observed that overexpression of HSPA12B activated PI3K/Akt signaling and suppressed JNK and p38 activation following cerebral I. Importantly, pharmacological inhibition of PI3K/Alct signaling abrogated the protection against cerebral I/R injury in Tg mice. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that HSPA12B protects the brains from focal cerebral I/R injury. The protective effect of HSPA12B is mediated though a PI3K/Akt-dependent mechanism. Our results suggest that HSPA12B may have a therapeutic potential against ischemic stroke. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据