3.8 Article

Cytoplasmic kinase and phosphatase activities can induce PsaF gene expression in the absence of functional plastids:: evidence that phosphorylation/dephosphorylation events are involved in interorganellar crosstalk

期刊

MOLECULAR AND GENERAL GENETICS
卷 264, 期 6, 页码 819-826

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s004380000371

关键词

plastid signal; photosynthesis; PsaF; protein kinase C

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PsaF is a nuclear gene for subunit III of the reaction center of photosystem I, and its expression is stimulated by cytokinins and light, when monitored at the mRNA level or at the level of GUS activity directed by chimeric promoter::uidA gene fusions in transgenic tobacco. These inductive effects can be mimicked by pertussis toxin, serotonin, phorbol acetate myristate or Ca2+, suggesting the involvement of heterotrimeric G proteins, phospholipids and Ca2+-dependent processes. Both breakdown pro ducts of the phosphatidylinositol cycle, inositol triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (or its homolog phorbol myristate acetate, PMA) appear to be involved. The IP3-dependent pathway requires kinase activity, and the signal operates via a 42-bp Ca2+-responsive element located between positions -220 and -178, while the PMA-dependent pathway requires phosphatase activity and a binding element that lies further upstream in the promoter. The effects of G proteins, phospholipids and Ca2+ on GUS gene expression are restricted to tissues with functional plastids, while modulation of phosphatase and kinase activities activates the responsive PsaF promoter regions even in photobleached material. Thus, activation of kinases and phosphatases can bypass the plastid-mediated inhibition of PsaF gene expression in tobacco seedlings. One cytoplasmic target which reflects the functional state of the plastids is protein kinase C. The enzyme can be efficiently phosphorylated in protein extracts from seedlings in which plastid function is impaired, but not in extracts from green tissue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据