4.4 Article

Enhancement, relaxation, and reversal of the stereoselectivity for phosphotriesterase by rational evolution of active site residues

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 40, 期 5, 页码 1332-1339

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi001549d

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM-33894] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The factors that govern the substrate reactivity and stereoselectivity of phosphotriesterase (PTE) toward organophosphotriesters containing various combinations of methyl, ethyl, isopropyl, and phenyl substituents at the phosphorus center were determined by systematic alterations in the dimensions of the active site. The wild type PTE prefers the Sp-enantiomers over the corresponding Rp-enantiomers by factors ranging from 10 to 90. Enlargement of the small subsite of PTE with the substitution of glycine and alanine residues for Ile-106, Phe-132, and/or Ser-308 resulted in significant improvements in k(cat)/K-a for the R-p-enantiomers of up to 2700-fold but had little effect on k(cat)/K-a for the corresponding S-p-enantiomers. The kinetic preferences for the Sp-enantiomers were thus relaxed without sacrificing the inherent catalytic activity of the wild type enzyme. A reduction in the size of the large subsite with the mutant H257Y resulted in a reduction in kcat/K-a for the S-p-enantiomers, while the values of k(cat)/K-a for the R-p-enantiomers were essentially unchanged. The initial stereoselectivity observed with the wild type enzyme toward the chiral substrate library was significantly reduced with the H257Y mutant. Simultaneous alternations in the sizes of the large and small subsites resulted in the complete reversal of the chiral specificity. With this series of mutants, the R-p-enantiomers were preferred as substrates over the corresponding S-p-enantiomers by up to 500-fold. These results have demonstrated that the stereochemical determinants for substrate hydrolysis by PTE can be systematically altered through a rational reconstruction of the dimensions of the active site.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据