4.7 Review

Mallory-Denk-bodies: Lessons from keratin-containing hepatic inclusion bodies

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2008.08.008

关键词

Keratin; Mallory-Denk body; Aggregate; Inclusion; Variant; P62; Ubiquitin; Oxidative stress; Steatohepatitis; Intracellular hyaline body

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [STR 1095/1-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inclusion bodies are characteristic morphological features of various neuronal. muscular and other human disorders. They share common molecular Constituents Such as p62, chaperones and proteasome Subunits. The proteins within aggregates are misfolded with increased beta-sheet structure, they are heavily phosphorylated, ubiquitinylated and partially degraded. Furthermore. involvement of proteasomal system represents a common feature of virtually all inclusions. Multiple aggregates contain intermediate filament proteins as their major Constituents. Among them, Mallory-Denk bodies (MDBs) are the best studied. MDBs represent hepatic inclusions observed in diverse chronic liver diseases Such as alcoholic and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, chronic cholestasis, metabolic disorders and hepatocellular neoplasms. MDBs are induced in mice fed griseofulvin or 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine and resolve after discontinuation of toxin administration. The availability of a drug-induced model makes MDBs a unique tool for studying inclusion formation. Our review summarizes the recent advances gained from this model and shows how they relate to observations in other aggregates. The MDB formation-underlying mechanisms include protein misfolding, chaperone alterations, disproportional protein expression with keratin 8>keratin 18 levels and subsequent keratin 8 crosslinking via transglutaminase. p62 presence is crucial for MDB formation. Proteasome inhibitors precipitate MDB formation, whereas stimulation of autophagy with rapamycin attenuates their formation. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据