4.6 Article

The prostaglandin EP4 receptor is a master regulator of the expression of PGE2 receptors following inflammatory activation in human monocytic cells

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2018.07.003

关键词

Prostaglandin EP4 receptor; Inflammatory activation; Human monocytic cells; Tumor necrosis factor

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education of Saudi Arabia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)) is responsible for inflammatory symptoms. However, PGE(2) also suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokine production. There are at least 4 subtypes of PGE(2) receptors, EP1-EP4, but it is unclear which of these specifically control cytokine production. The aim of this study was to determine which of the different receptors, EP1R-EP4R modulate production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in human monocytic cells. Human blood, or the human monocytic cell line THP-1 were stimulated with LPS. The actions of PGE(2), alongside selective agonists of EP1-EP4 receptors, were assessed on LPS-induced TNF-alpha, IL-beta and IL-10 release. The expression profiles of EP2R and EP4R in monocytes and THP-1 cells were characterised by RT-qPCR. In addition, the production of cytokines was evaluated following knockdown of the receptors using siRNA and over-expression of the receptors by transfection with constructs. PGE(2) and also EP2 and EP4 agonists (but not EP1 or EP3 agonists) suppressed TNF-alpha production in blood and THP-1 cells. LPS also up regulated expression of EP2R and EP4R but not EP1 or EP3. siRNA for either EP2R or EP4R reversed the suppressive actions of PGE(2) on cytokine production and overexpression of EP2R and EP4R enhanced the suppressive actions of PGE(2). This indicates that PGE(2) suppression of TNF-alpha by human monocytic cells occurs via EP2R and EP4R expression. However EP4Rs also control their own expression and that of EP2 whereas the EP2R does not affect EP4R expression. This implies that EP4 receptors have an important master role in controlling inflammatory responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据