4.4 Article

Stability, folding, dimerization, and assembly properties of the yeast prion Ure2p

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 40, 期 6, 页码 1764-1773

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi001916l

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The [URE3] factor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae propagates by a prion-like mechanism and corresponds to the loss of the function of the cellular protein Ure2. The molecular basis of the propagation of this phenotype is unknown. We recently expressed Ure2p in Escherichia coli and demonstrated that the N-terminal region of the protein is flexible and unstructured, while its C-terminal region is compactly folded. Ure2p oligomerizes in solution to form mainly dimers that assemble into fibrils [Thual et al. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 13666-13674]. To determine the role played by each domain of Ure2p in the overall properties of the protein, specifically, its stability, conformation, and capacity to assemble into fibrils, we have further analyzed the properties of Ure2p N- and C-terminal regions. We show here that Ure2p dimerizes through its C-terminal region. We also show that the N-terminal region is essential for directing the assembly of the protein into a particular pathway that yields amyloid fibrils. A full-length Ure2p variant that possesses an additional tryptophan residue in its N-terminal moiety was generated to follow conformational changes affecting this domain. Comparison of the overall conformation, folding, and unfolding properties, and the behavior upon proteolytic treatments of full-length Ure2p, Ure2pW37 variant, and Ure2p C-terminal fragment reveals that Ure2p N-terminal domain confers no additional stability to the protein. This study reveals the existence of a stable unfolding intermediate of Ure2p under conditions where the protein assembles into amyloid fibrils. Our results contradict the intramolecular interaction between the N- and C-terminal moieties of Ure2p and the single unfolding transitions reported in a number of previous studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据