4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Phase III comparison of high-dose paclitaxel plus cisplatin plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus low-dose paclitaxel plus cisplatin in advanced head and neck cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E1393

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 1088-1095

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.4.1088

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA66636, CA21115, CA20365, CA23318, CA49957, CA16116] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To determine dose-response effects and the activity of paclitaxel combined with cisplatin in patients with incurable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Patients and Methods: Two hundred ten patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease were randomly placed in either Arm A, paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) (24-hour infusion) + cisplatin 75mg/m(2) + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, or Arm B, paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) (24-hour infusion) + cisplatin 75 mg/m(2). Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks until progression or a total of 12 cycles for complete responses. Primary outcomes were event-free and overall survival. Results: No significant differences in outcomes were observed between the high- and low-dose paclitaxel regimens. The estimated median survival was 7.3 months (95% confidence interval, 6.0 to 8.6). The 1-year survival rate was 29%, and event-free survival was 4.0 months. The objective response rate (complete response plus partial response) war 35% for the high-dose patients and 36% for the low-dose patients. Myelosuppression was the most frequent toxicity: grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia, 70% of patients in Arm A and 78% in Arm a; febrile neutropenia, 27% of patients in Arm A and 39% in Arm a. Grade 5 toxicities occurred in 22 patients (10.5%). Treatment was terminated early in 31% because of excessive toxicity or patient refusal. Conclusion: This phase III multicenter trial showed (1) no advantage for high-dose paclitaxel and (2) excessive hematologic toxicity associated with both regimens. Therefore, neither of the paclitaxel regimens evaluated in this trial can be recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据