4.7 Article

Cell-surface trafficking and release of flt3 ligand from T lymphocytes is induced by common cytokine receptor γ-chain signaling and inhibited by cyclosporin A

期刊

BLOOD
卷 97, 期 4, 页码 1027-1034

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood.V97.4.1027

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The flt3 ligand (FL) is a growth and differentiation factor for primitive hematopoietic precursors, dendritic cells, and natural killer cells, Human T lymphocytes express FL constitutively, but the cytokine is retained intracellularly within the Golgi complex. FL is mobilized from the cytoplasmic stores and its serum levels are massively increased during the period of bone marrow aplasia after stem cell transplantation (SCT), Signals that trigger the release of FL by T cells remain unknown, This study shows that interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-7, and IL-15, acting through a common receptor gamma chain (gammac), but not cytokines interacting with other receptor families, are efficient inducers of cell surface expression of membrane-bound FL (mFL) and secretion of soluble FL (sFL) by human peripheral blood T lymphocytes. The gammac-mediated signaling up-regulated FL in a T-cell receptor-independent manner. IL-2 and IL-7 stimulated both FL messenger RNA (mRNA) expression and translocation of FL protein to the cell surface. Cyclosporin A (CsA) inhibited gammac-mediated trafficking of FL at the level of transition from the Golgi to the trans-Golgi network, Accordingly, serum levels of sFL and expression of mFL by T cells of CsA-treated recipients of stem cell allografts were reduced approximately 2-fold (P < .01) compared to patients receiving autologous grafts. The conclusion is that FL expression is controlled by c receptor signaling and that CsA interferes with FL release by T cells. The link between gammac-dependent T-cell activation and FL expression might be important for T-cell effector functions in graft acceptance and antitumor immunity after SCT. (C) 2001 by The American Society of Hematology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据