4.8 Article

A study on carbothermal reduction of sulfur dioxide to elemental sulfur using oilsands fluid coke

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 800-804

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es001581v

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experiments and reaction equilibrium calculations were carried out for the SO2 gas and oilsands fluid coke system. The goal was to develop a coke-based sulfur-producing flue gas desulfurization (SP-FGD) process that removes SO2 from flue gases and converts it into elemental sulfur. The conversion of SO2 to elemental sulfur proceeded efficiently at temperatures higher than 600 degreesC, and the sulfur yield reached a maximum (>95%) at about 700 degreesC. An increase of temperature beyond 700 degreesC enhanced the reduction of product elemental sulfur, resulting in the formation of reduced sulfur species (COS and CS2), which lowered the sulfur yield at 900 degreesC to 90%. Although equilibrium calculations suggest that a lower temperature favors the conversion of SO2 as well as the yield of elemental sulfur, experiments showed no formation of elemental sulfur at 600 degreesC and below, likely due to hindered kinetics. Faster reduction of SO2 was observed at a higher temperature in the range of 700-1000 degreesC. A complete conversion of SO2 was achieved in about 8 s at 700 degreesC. Prolonging the product gas-coke contact, the yield of elemental sulfur decreased due to the formation of COS and CS2 while the SO2 conversion remained complete. Equilibrium calculations suggest that the ultimate yield of elemental sulfur maximizes at the C/SO2 ratio of 1, which represents the stoichiometry of SO2 + C --> CO2 + S. For the C/SO2 ratio < 1, equilibrium calculations predict elemental sulfur and CO2 being major products, suggesting that SO2 + C --> CO2 + S is the predominant reaction if SO2 is in excess. Experiments revealed that elemental sulfur and CO2 were only major products if the conversion of SO2 was incomplete, which is in agreement with the result of the equilibrium modeling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据