4.6 Article

Propylisopropylacetic acid (PIA), a constitutional isomer of valproic acid, uncompetitively inhibits arachidonic acid acylation by rat acyl-CoA synthetase 4: A potential drug for bipolar disorder

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2013.01.008

关键词

Bipolar disorder; Valproic acid; Arachidonic acid; Acyl-CoA synthetase 4; Mood stabilizer; Propylisopropylacetic acid; Uncompetitive inhibition

资金

  1. Intramural Program of the National Institute on Aging, NIH
  2. NIH [DK 59935]
  3. American Heart Association-Mid-Atlantic Region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Mood stabilizers used for treating bipolar disorder (BD) selectively downregulate arachidonic add (AA) turnover (deacylation-reacylation) in brain phospholipids, when given chronically to rats. In vitro studies suggest that one of these, valproic add (VPA), which is teratogenic, reduces AA turnover by inhibiting the brain long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase (Acsl)4 mediated acylation of AA to AA-CoA. We tested whether non-teratogenic VPA analogues might also inhibit Acsl4 catalyzed acylation, and thus have a potential anti-BD action. Methods: Rat Acsl4-flag protein was expressed in Escherichia coli, and the ability of three VPA analogues, propylisopropylacetic acid (PIA), propylisopropylacetamide (PID) and N-methyl-2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxamide (MTMCD), and of sodium butyrate, to inhibit conversion of AA to AA-CoA by Acsl4 was quantified using Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Results: Acsl4-mediated conversion of AA to AA-CoA in vitro was inhibited uncompetitively by PIA, with a K-i of 11.4 mM compared to a published Ki of 25 mM for VPA, while PID, MTMCD and sodium butyrate had no inhibitory effect. Conclusions: PIA's ability to inhibit conversion of AA to AA-CoA by Acsl4 in vitro suggests that, like VPA, PIA may reduce AA turnover in brain phospholipids in unanesthetized rats, and if so, may be effective as a non-teratogenic mood stabilizer in BD patients. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据