4.6 Article

Identification of trains of sleep sequences in adult rats

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 119, 期 1, 页码 93-101

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4328(00)00339-9

关键词

slow wave sleep; transition sleep; paradoxical sleep; sleep sequences; sleep trains; sequential hypothesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In previous studies based on high resolution EEG analyses of the 7 h baseline session of 18 adult male Wistar rats [6,14]. we have identified four sleep sequences initiating with slow wave sleep (SS) and terminating with waking (W) or paradoxical sleep (PS). Two of these sequences contained an intervening episode of transition sleep (TS). Several variables of these sequences (SS --> W, SS --> TS --> W, SS --> TS --> PS, and SS --> PS) were selectively correlated with the capacity of rats to learn a two-way active avoidance task the following day, and were differently distributed in fast learning, slow learning and non learning rats [21]. The temporal organization of different sleep components in sequences suggested that a comparable temporal organization might concern the different sleep sequences, albeit on a longer time scale. We have now used waking periods longer than 60 s to separate clusters of baseline sleep sequences (trains) in the same rats. Trains containing the same sleep sequence (homogeneous trains) have been distinguished from trains containing different sleep sequences (mixed trains). In addition, mixed trains including the SS --> TS --> W sequence ( + TSW trains) have been separated from mixed trains lacking that sequence ( - TSW trains). Mixed trains of the + TSW type were longest and most numerous, while homogeneous trains were shortest and least abundant. Mixed trains of the - TSW type displayed intermediate values. Several variables of sleep sequences and sleep components differed within mixed trains and among mixed and homogeneous trains. The data indicate that baseline sleep sequences aggregate in relatively long strings in a non random fashion. The mechanism of this association is discussed. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据