4.6 Article

Dynamic changes in subnuclear NP95 location during the cell cycle and its spatial relationship with DNA replication foci

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 263, 期 2, 页码 202-208

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/excr.2000.5115

关键词

NP95; chromatin-bound PCNA; growth-regulated gene; DNA replication; cell cycle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We determined the expression and subcellular localization of nuclear protein NP95 during the cell cycle in mouse 3T3 cells. The levels of NP95 mRNA and protein were extremely low in quiescent cells; however, stimulation with 10% serum increased their expressions in a time course similar to that of the late growth-regulated gene proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), Subnuclear location of NP95 dynamically changed during the cell cycle. Double immunostaining for NP95 and chromatin-bound PCNA, a marker of DNA replication sites, revealed that NP95 was almost exclusively colocalized with chromatin-bound PCNA throughout the nucleus in early S phase and partly in mid-S phase. Distinct localization of the two proteins, however, became evident in mid-S phase, and thereafter, many chromatin-bound PCNA foci not carrying NP95 foci could be detected. In G2 phase, nodular NP95 foci were still identified without any chromatin-bound PCNA foci, Chromatin-bound PCNA was observed as a pre-DNA replication complex at the C1/S boundary synchronized by hydroxyurea treatment, while NP95 was detected in nucleolar regions as unique large foci, There was no significant redistribution of NP95 foci shortly after DNA damage by gamma -irradiation. Nodular NP95 foci characteristically seen in G2 phase were also detected in G2-arrested cells following gamma -irradiation, Taken together, our results indicate that NP95 is assigned to a late growth-regulated gene and suggest that NP95 does not take a direct part in DNA replication as part of the DNA synthesizing machinery, like PCNA, but is presumably involved in other DNA replication-linked nuclear events. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据