4.4 Article

Placebo-controlled trial of prednisone in advanced HIV-1 infection

期刊

AIDS
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 321-327

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200102160-00004

关键词

AIDS; HIV-1 infection; corticosteroids; immune activation; cytokines; immune-based therapy; tumor necrosis factor alpha

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-36219] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine the safety and the immunologic and virologic consequences of corticosteroid use in HIV-1 infection. Methods: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of corticosteroid administration in 41 patients with advanced HIV-1 infection. Patients had a baseline median CD4 cell count of 131 x 10(6) cells/l at enrollment and 85% had a history of opportunistic infection. All but one of the patients had been taking stable antiretroviral regimen, including a protease inhibitor in 36, for a median duration of 158 days. Patients were randomized to 8 weeks of prednisone 0.5 mg/kg daily or placebo. Results: No AIDS-defining events occurred; two patients in each group developed oral candidiasis, and two patients on prednisone developed mild herpes simplex flares. None who developed oral candidiasis or herpes simplex was receiving prophylaxis and each responded promptly to therapy. In the prednisone group, two patients developed hyperglycemia and one diabetic increased insulin requirements. CD4 cell counts and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels did not change, but plasma tumor necrosis factor alpha levels and CD38+CD8+ cells decreased significantly in those taking prednisone. Conclusion: Short-term prednisone administration is well tolerated and reasonably safe in advanced HIV-1 disease and decreases immune activation without effects on HIV-1 RNA levels or CD4 cell counts. These results suggest that, in stable HIV-1 disease, these immune activation markers are more likely consequences of but not inducers of HIV-1 replication. (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据