4.5 Article

SB 239063, a novel p38 inhibitor, attenuates early neuronal injury following ischemia

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 892, 期 1, 页码 70-77

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)03228-5

关键词

stroke; p38 MAPK; neuronal injury; neuroprotection; focal ischemia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present study was to evaluate p38 MAPK activation following focal stroke and determine whether SE 239063, a novel second generation p38 inhibitor, would directly attenuate early neuronal injury. Following permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO), brains were dissected into ischemic and non-ischemic cortices and Western blots were employed to measure p38 MAPK activation. Neurologic deficit and MR imaging were utilized at various time points following MCAO to monitor the development and resolution of brain injury. Following MCAO, there was an early (15 min) activation of p38 MAPK (2.3-fold) which remained elevated up to 1 h (1.8-fold) post injury compared to non-ischemic and sham operated tissue. Oral SE 239063 (5, 15, 30, 60 mg/kg) administered to each animal 1 h pre- and 6 h post MCAO provided significant (P<0.05) dose-related neuroprotection reducing infarct size by 42, 48, 29 and 14%, respectively. The most effective dose (15 mg/kg) was further evaluated in detail and SE 239063 significantly (P<0.05) reduced neurologic deficit and infarct size by at least 30% from 24 h through at least 1 week. Early (i.e, observed within 2 h) reductions in diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) intensity following treatment with SE 239063 correlated (r=0.74, P<0.01) to neuroprotection seen up to 7 days post stroke. Since increased protein levels for various pro-inflammatory cytokines cannot be detected prior to 2 h in this stroke model, the early improvements due to p38 inhibition, observed using DWI, demonstrate that p38 inhibition can be neuroprotective through direct effects on ischemic brain cells, in addition to effects on inflammation. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science BN. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据