4.4 Article

Identification of human CYP2C19 residues that confer S-mephenytoin 4′-hydroxylation activity to CYP2C9

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 40, 期 7, 页码 1937-1944

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi001678u

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM31001] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CYP2C19 is selective for the 4 ' -hydroxylation of S-mephenytoin while the highly similar CYP2C9 has We activity toward this substrate. To identify critical amino acids determining the specificity of human CYP2C19 for S-mephenytoin 4 ' -hydroxylation, we constructed chimeras by replacing portions of CYP2C9 containing various proposed substrate recognition sites (SRSs) with those of CYP2C19 and mutating individual residues by site-directed mutagenesis. Only a chimera containing regions encompassing SRSs 1-4 was active (30% of wild-type CYP2C19), indicating that multiple regions are necessary to confer specificity for S-mephenytoin. Mutagenesis studies identified six residues in three topological components of the proteins required to convert CYP2C9 to an S-mephenytoin 4 ' hydroxylase (6% of the activity of wild-type CYP2C19). Of these, only the I99H difference located in SRS 1 between helices B and C reflects a change in a side chain that is predicted to be in the substrate-binding cavity formed above the heme prosthetic group. Two additional substitutions, S220P and P221T residing between helices F and G but not in close proximity to the substrate binding site together with five differences in the N-terminal portion of helix I conferred S-mephenytoin 4 ' -hydroxylation activity with a KM similar to that of CYP2C19 but a 3-fold lower K-cat. Three residues in helix I, S286N, V292A, and F2951, were essential for S-mephenytoin 4 ' -hydroxylation activity. On the basis of the structure of the closely related enzyme CYP2C5, these residues are unlikely to directly contact the substrate during catalysis but are positioned to influence the packing of substrate binding site residues and likely substrate access channels in the enzyme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据