4.7 Article

Infrared spectra and spectral energy distributions of late M and L dwarfs

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 548, 期 2, 页码 908-918

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/319020

关键词

infrared : stars; stars : fundamental parameters; stars : late-type; stars : low-mass; brown dwarfs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have obtained 1.0-2.5 km spectra at R similar to 600 of 14 disk dwarfs with spectral types M6-L7. For four of the dwarfs, we have also obtained infrared spectra at R similar to 3000 in several narrow intervals. In addition, we present new L' photometry for four of the dwarfs in the sample, which allows improved determinations of their bolometric luminosities. While obtaining the photometry we resolved the L dwarf Denis-P J0205-1159 into an identical pair of objects separated by The spectra together with the 0.35. published energy distribution for one other L5 dwarf are compared to synthetic spectra generated by upgraded model atmospheres. Good matches are found for 2200 K greater than or equal to T-eff greater than or equal to 1900 K (spectral types around M9-L3), but discrepancies exist at T-eff greater than or equal to 2300 K (M8) and T-eff less than or equal to 1800 K (L4-L7). At the higher temperatures the mismatches are due to incompleteness in the water vapor opacity line list. At the lower temperatures the disagreement is probably due to our treatment of dust; we assume a photospheric distribution in equilibrium with the gas phase and neglect any diffusion mechanisms. We derive effective temperatures for the sample from the comparison with synthetic spectra and also by comparing our observed total intrinsic luminosities to structural model calculations (which are mostly independent of the atmosphere but are dependent on the unknown masses and ages of the targets). The two derivations agree to about 200 K except for the faintest object in the sample, where the discrepancy is larger. Agreement with other temperature determinations is also +/- similar to 200 K, except for the L7 dwarf.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据