4.6 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: Liver conversion of docosahexaenoic and arachidonic acids from their 18-carbon precursors in rats on a DHA-free but α-LNA-containing n-3 PUFA adequate diet (Retracted article. See vol. 1851, pg. 238, 2015)

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.05.008

关键词

Conversion; Arachidonic; Docosahexaenoic; Diet; Liver; Turnover

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA. 20:5n-3), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6n-3), and arachidonic acid (AA, 20:4n-6), are critical for health. These PUFAs can be synthesized in liver from their plant-derived precursors, a-linolenic acid (alpha-LNA, 18:3n-3) and linoleic acid (LA, 18:2n-6). Vegetarians and vegans may have suboptimal long-chain n-3 PUFA status, and the extent of the conversion of alpha-LNA to EPA and DHA by the liver is debatable. We quantified liver conversion of DHA and other n-3 PUFAs from alpha-LNA in rats fed a DHA-free but alpha-LNA (n-3 PUFA) adequate diet, and compared results to conversion of LA to AA. [U-C-13]LA or [U-13C] alpha-LNA was infused intravenously for 2 h at a constant rate into unanesthetized rats fed a DHA-free alpha-LNA adequate diet, and published equations were used to calculate kinetic parameters. The conversion coefficient k* of DHA from alpha-LNA was much higher than for AA from LA (97.2 x 10(-3) vs. 10.6 x 10(-3) min(-1)), suggesting that liver elongation-desaturation is more selective for n-3 PUFA biosynthesis on a per molecule basis. The net daily secretion rate of DHA, 20.3 mu mol/day, exceeded the reported brain DHA consumption rate by 50-fold, suggesting that the liver can maintain brain DHA metabolism with an adequate dietary supply solely of alpha-LNA. This infusion method could be used in vegetarians or vegans to determine minimal daily requirements of EPA and DHA in humans. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据