4.7 Article

Mortality in antiepileptic drug development programs

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 56, 期 4, 页码 514-519

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.56.4.514

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Pooled data from New Drug Applications (NDAs) submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) provide an opportunity to study the incidence of and risk factors for rare events. Objective: To examine the incidence and causes of mortality in patients with epilepsy participating in clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs); and to examine the incidence of and risk factors for sudden unexplained death in such patients. Methods: Exposure data and death narratives were obtained from the NDAs of five recently reviewed AEDs. Deaths were classified as sudden unexplained, accidental, or other cause using the 1993 Burroughs-Wellcome expert panel criteria, and mortality rates were calculated for each category. Add-on trials were analyzed separately from monotherapy initiation trials. Results: Among 9,144 patients in the add-on trial database, the all-cause and sudden unexplained mortality rates were 9.1 and 3.8 deaths per 1,000 person-years (124 and 52 deaths in 13,617.1 person-years of drug exposure). Sixty-five percent of all deaths were related to the underlying epilepsy. Of the examined risk factors, only age was associated with the incidence of sudden unexplained death. Among 1,293 patients in the monotherapy initiation trials, the all-cause and sudden unexplained mortality rates were 7.1 and 0 deaths per 1,000 person-years (7 and 0 deaths in 982.5 person-years of drug exposure). Conclusions: A large proportion of the deaths in the add-on cohort was attributable to epilepsy-related causes. Mortality due to sudden death in the add-on cohort falls into the high end of the reported range for patients with epilepsy. The difference in mortality due to sudden death between the add-on and monotherapy initiation cohorts suggests that disease severity is the primary determining factor for risk of sudden unexplained death.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据