4.8 Article

Blunted cardiac responses to receptor activation in subjects with Thr164Ile β2-adrenoceptors

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 103, 期 8, 页码 1048-1050

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.103.8.1048

关键词

receptors, adrenergic, beta; myocardial contraction; heart rate; terbutaline; genetics

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL58120] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Recent evidence indicates that certain genotypes of beta (2)-adrenoceptors (AR) may indicate an increased risk of cardiovascular disease or an increased rate of disease progression. Of particular importance, the Thr164Ile polymorphism, which is found in approximate to4% of humans, shows decreased receptor signaling, blunted cardiac response when expressed in transgenic mice, and is associated with a decreased survival rate in patients with congestive heart failure. Methods and Results-In this study, we compared functional activity, ie, chronotropic (heart rate increases) and inotropic (duration of the electromechanical systole) responses to intravenously administered terbutaline, in 6 subjects (4 women and 2 men) who were heterozygous for Thr164Ile with the responses in 12 volunteers (6 women and 6 men) who were homozygous for wild-type (WT) beta (2)-AR (ie, Arg16, Gln27, and Thr164). The beta (2)AR polymorphism significantly affected the dose-response curves for terbutaline-induced inotropic and chronotropic responses: compared with WT individuals, subjects with the Thr164Ile receptor had substantial blunting in maximal increases in heart rate (WT, 29.7+/-3.9 beats/min; Ile164, 20.7+/-1.9 beats/min; P=0.016) and a shortening of the duration of electromechanical systole (WT, 51.9+/-4.5 ms; Ile164, 37.9+/-4.6 ms; P=0.02). Conclusions-These data show that humans with the Ile164 genotype show blunted cardiac beta (2)-AR responsiveness, which may help explain the decreased survival of patients with this genotype in the setting of congestive heart failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据