4.6 Article

Insulin-induced translocation of CD36 to the plasma membrane is reversible and shows similarity to that of GLUT4

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2007.11.006

关键词

insulin; CD36; GLUT4; translocase; long-chain fatty acid; translocation; signal transduction; CHO cells; immuno-fluorescence microscopy; membrane permeabilization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In cardiac and skeletal muscles, insulin regulates the uptake of long-chain fatty acid (LCFA) via the putative LCFA transporter CD36. Biochemical studies propose an insulin-induced translocation of CD36 from intracellular pools to the plasma membrane (PM), similar to glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) translocation. To characterize insulin-induced CD36 translocation in intact cells, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably expressing CD36 or myc-tagged GLUT4 (GLUT4myc) were created. Immuno-fluorescence microscopy revealed CD36 to be located both intracellularly (in - at least partially - different compartments than GLUT4myc) and at the PM. Upon stimulation with insulin, CD36 translocated to a PM localization similar to that of GLUT4myc; the increase in PM CD36 content, as quantified by surface-protein biotinylation, amounted to 1.7-fold. The insulin-induced CD36 translocation was shown to be phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase-dependent, and reversible (as evidenced by insulin wash-out) in a similar time frame as that for GLUT4. The expression of GLUT4myc in non-stimulated cells, and the insulin-induced increase in PM GLUT4myc correlated with increased deoxyglucose uptake. By contrast, CD36 expression in non-stimulated cells and the insulin-induced increase in PM CD36 were not paralleled by a rise in LCFA uptake, suggesting that in these cells, such increase requires additional proteins, or a protein activation step. Taken together, this study is the first to present morphological evidence for CD36 translocation, and shows this process to resemble GLUT4 translocation. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据