4.1 Article

Long-term outcome of children with complete heart block diagnosed after the newborn period

期刊

PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 133-137

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s002460010179

关键词

congenital heart block; cardiomyopathy; heart defects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aims of this study were to assess morbidity, mortality, and long-term cardiac outcome of children with congenital complete heart block (CHB) diagnosed between the ages of 3 months and 15 years. The study population consists of 61 children with CHB diagnosed in five tertiary referral centers in Finland. There were two study groups: CHB diagnosed 3 months to 2 years of age (group 1; n = 29) and CHB diagnosed between the age of 2 and 15 years (group 2; n = 32). Neonatal morbidity was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (p = 0.047). In the whole study population, permanent pacemaker implantation with the main indications of low ventricular rate and syncope (52%) was performed in 80% of cases, with a median age of 11.2 years. Structural heart defect not causally associated with CHB was evident in 9 of 61 patients (15%). Of 8 patients with atrial septal defect (ASD) secundum, 6 (75%) were operated on and 7 (88%) were paced. One patient had small ventricular septal defect. The incidence of dilated cardiomyopathy was 7%. The mortality with cardiomyopathy was very high (75%). Of the 61 children, 3 (5%) died due to cardiomyopathy at the ages of 2, 26, and 31 years. In the long-term follow-up of 17 years (median, range 2.9-46 years) 17% of patients who survived had cardiac problems: arrhythmias in 5, mitral valve insufficiency in 3, ASD secundum in 1, and cardiomyopathy in 1. The long-term outcome did not depend on the age at which CHB was diagnosed. In conclusion, CHB diagnosed after the newborn period carries relatively low mortality and morbidity. Pacemaker application was indicated in most children. The possibility of an associated heart defect or dilated cardiomyopathy indicates regular echocardiographic monitoring in all children and young adults with CHB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据