4.5 Review

Leukotrienes and airway inflammation

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS
卷 1810, 期 11, 页码 1096-1102

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.02.005

关键词

Asthma; Cysteinyl leukotriene; Leukotriene receptor antagonist; 5-Lipoxygenase; Leukotriene B-4

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL094311-03, R01 HL058897, R56 HL058897-12, R01 HL094311, R56 HL058897] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Asthma is a common chronic inflammatory disease of the airways characterized by airway obstruction and hyperresponsiveness. Leukotrienes (LTs) are lipid mediators that contribute to many aspects of asthma pathogenesis. As the LT pathway is relatively steroid-resistant, its blockade by alternative strategies is a desirable component of asthma management. Cysteinyl LT (cysLT) receptor 1 antagonists (LTRAs) have been utilized worldwide for more than 10 years, and while their efficacy in asthma is well accepted, their limitations are also evident. Scope of Review: In this review, we summarize the biological effects of LTs in asthma, review recent advances in LT receptors, and consider possible new therapeutic targets in the LT pathway that offer the potential to achieve better control of asthma in the future. Major Conclusions: CysLTs play pathogenetic roles in many aspects of asthma, and blockade of cysLT receptor 1 by currently available LTRAs is certainly beneficial in disease management. On the other hand, the limitations of LTRAs are also apparent. Recent studies have revealed new receptors for cysLTs other than classical cysLT receptors 1 and 2, as well as the potential importance of LTB4 in asthma. General Significance: Recent findings provide clues to new approaches for targeting the LT pathway that may overcome the current limitations of LTRAs and achieve superior control of asthma. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Biochemistry of Asthma. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据